Assessment of Financial Risk Prediction Models with Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods
نویسندگان
چکیده
A wide range of classification models have been explored for financial risk prediction, but conclusions on which technique behaves better may vary when different performance evaluation measures are employed. Accordingly, this paper proposes the use of multiple criteria decision making tools in order to give a ranking of algorithms. More specifically, the selection of the most appropriate credit risk prediction method is here modeled as a multi-criteria decision making problem that involves a number of performance measures (criteria) and classification techniques (alternatives). An empirical study is carried out to evaluate the performance of ten algorithms over six real-life credit risk data sets. The results reveal that the use of a unique performance measure may lead to unreliable conclusions, whereas this situation can be overcome by the application of multicriteria decision making techniques. Key-Words: Data mining; Multi-criteria decision making; Credit risk prediction
منابع مشابه
Risk Assessment of Investments with Fuzzy Efficiency Indicators for Oil and Gas Production Industry
In the process of investment decision making, next to financial indicators many other aspects of investment projects are increasingly often considered. This leads to the multi-criteria evaluation of a project. The advantage of multi-criteria methods is the ability to take into account all (not only financial) aspects of the attractiveness of an investment project. The selection of criteria of p...
متن کاملRisk management in urban tunnels using methods of game theory and multi-criteria decision-making
In general, underground spaces are associated with high risks because of their high uncertainty in geotechnical environments. Since most accidents and incidents in these structures are often associated with uncertainty, the development of risk analysis and management methods and prevention of accidents are essential. A deeper recognition of the factors affecting the implementation process can p...
متن کاملA Multi-layer Architecture Based on MCDM Methods to Select the Best E-Readiness Assessment Model According to SWOT Analysis
E-readiness is one of the major prerequisites for effective implementation of e-government. For the correct implementation of e-government, it is needed to accurately assess the state of e-readiness in desired community. In this regard, there are models to assess, but the correct choice of model is one of the most important challenges in this area. The process of evaluating and selecting the ap...
متن کاملrisk assessment by integration approach of FMEA and multi criteria decision-making in the interval valued fuzzy environment: case study hydraulic pump manufacturing industry
Abstract Background and aims: Nowadays with increasing global competition, companies apply several scientific methods to identify, assess and remove potential failures in production process. The main goal of this study was identification and analysis of potential failure modes in a hydraulic pump manufacturing company by using combination of interval valued fuzzy Analytic network process (IVF-...
متن کاملMultigranulation single valued neutrosophic covering-based rough sets and their applications to multi-criteria group decision making
In this paper, three types of (philosophical, optimistic and pessimistic) multigranulation single valued neutrosophic (SVN) covering-based rough set models are presented, and these three models are applied to the problem of multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM).Firstly, a type of SVN covering-based rough set model is proposed.Based on this rough set model, three types of mult...
متن کامل